Came across this in my twitter stream:
Which in and of itself is just amusing, but what got me was that when I went to the AWS Status page there was no mention of it. It had already been 15 minutes since the tweet, but nothing. So I did a twitter search, and found this one:
Which got posted nearly 45 minutes before amazon updated their status page to say:
11:19 AM PDT We’re investigating reports of timeouts in California.
Now I don’t think downtime, especially infrequent and geographically limited downtime, is any sort of “see thats why you shouldn’t use teh cloud!” argument. If anything odds are people who use cloudfront have more downtime in their webapp than amazon ever will. However 45 minute response times mean 45 minutes of wasted troubleshooting time, multiplied by the number of engineers looking into it. Its that feeling of blind, uninformed, in-the-darkness while your cloud provider gets around to acknowledging things that worries me.